Tools
Myers Brigg
Definition/Introduction
The Myers-Briggs type indicator (MBTI) is a measure of personality type based on the work of psychologist Carl Jung. Isabel Myers developed the MBTI during the Second World War to facilitate better working relationships between healthcare professionals, particularly nurses.[1] She modeled this questionnaire on Jung's theory of "individual preference," which suggests that seemingly random variation in human behavior is attributable to fundamental individual differences in mental and emotional functioning.[2] Myers described these variations as simply different ways individuals prefer to use their minds.
The indicator operationalizes these preferences with questions indicating the individual's propensity towards 1 end of a dipole in 4 categories:
- Energy
- Perceiving
- Judging
- Orientation
Energy
Energy encompasses the scale of extraversion to introversion. Those tending towards extraversion direct their attention to external experiences and actions, deriving energy from those around them. Those tending towards introversion direct their attention towards inner thoughts and ideas, acquiring energy from solitude.
Perceiving
Perceiving describes how individuals prefer to intake information on the sensing scale versus intuitive types. Sensing types prefer to gather information using the 5 senses. They require gathering facts before understanding general ideas and patterns. Intuitive types prefer to rely on instincts and view problems from the "big picture" perspective, realizing general patterns before identifying constituent facts.
Judging
Judging categorizes how individuals prefer to make decisions from thinking to feeling. Thinkers rely on logic and facts, while feelers seek harmony in resolving an issue.
Orientation
Orientation applies to the preferred lifestyle on the scale of judging to perceiving. Those preferring judgment tend towards an orderly, decisive, and settled lifestyle, while those who prefer a more flexible, unpredictable existence align with the perceiving type.[1]
Sixteen personality types are possible with the combinations of 2 poles in 4 different categories. The representation of these types is with 4 letters indicating the individual's propensity in each category. For example, someone tending towards extraversion in energy, intuition in perceiving, thinking in judging, and perceiving in orientation would have the personality type ENTP.
The goal of the Myers-Briggs typology is to increase awareness of oneself and others and advance through Jung's "individuation." This process is describable as the integration, differentiation, and development of one's traits and skills.[2] One can begin analyzing and applying those preferences in work and personal endeavors by understanding one's individual preferences.
Issues of Concern
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Issues of Concern
Myer's primary intended application of the MBTI was for team building in the healthcare setting. Differences in approach to problem-solving and communication have the potential to create barriers to teamwork. Understanding these different thinking and perceiving preferences through MBTI typology can inform strategic changes to workflow and evaluation techniques.[3]
Clinical Significance
Although the MBTI was not designed for clinical use, it has had application to some patient populations. In psychology and psychiatry, the MBTI may help understand specific patient populations, such as those suffering from suicidality and unipolar depression. In both populations, greater tendencies towards introversion energy and perception orientation have been identified compared to the normative population. The researchers suggest that with more confirmatory samples, these correlations may be useful in identifying vulnerability in patients with affective disorder.[4][5]
Most significantly, the MBTI may have applications to fostering communication between healthcare professionals and patients. It is important to consider possible communication differences between the provider and the patient. For example, some research suggests that there are significantly more introverts, intuitive perceivers, thinking deciders, and judging-oriented individuals among a doctor population compared to a general adult population, which consists of more extroverts, sensing-perceivers, feeling deciders, and perceiving-orientated persons.[6] These potential differences can affect patients' interpretations of their provider encounters. A doctor tending towards intuitive perception and thinking judgment may be inclined to approach communication with the following attitudes:
- Respect my intelligence and desire to understand
- Demonstrate your competence
- Answer my questions honestly
- Give me options to see a pattern [6]
However, a patient tending towards sensing, perceiving, and feeling decisions may approach communication with the following attitudes:
- Listen carefully to me
- Give me your complete attention
- Be warm and friendly
- Give me facts with a personal touch
- Provide practical information about my condition [6]
Suggested approaches to remedy these differences include applying the MBTI typology in communication skills training for health care professionals.[6][7] Formal and structured approaches to instructing professionalism and communication have demonstrated greater effectiveness than passive observational learning, which is critical as improved patient-physician communication correlates better health outcomes as welanded legal action.[8][9][10]
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
All members of the interprofessional healthcare team would do well to have at least a general understanding of the MBTI grading system, as it can facilitate patient interactions, increase empathy for how a patient views their life and world, facilitate interprofessional team communication and collaboration, and lead to improved communication with patients., leading to improved patient outcomes.
References
Allen J. Using the Myers Briggs Type Indicator--part of the solution. British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing). 1994 May 12-25:3(9):473-7 [PubMed PMID: 8012190]
Myers S. Myers-Briggs typology and Jungian individuation. The Journal of analytical psychology. 2016 Jun:61(3):289-308. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12233. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27192365]
Sladek RM, Bond MJ, Phillips PA. Do doctors, nurses and managers have different thinking styles? Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association. 2010 Aug:34(3):375-80. doi: 10.1071/AH09791. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20797372]
Janowsky DS,Morter S,Hong L, Relationship of Myers Briggs type indicator personality characteristics to suicidality in affective disorder patients. Journal of psychiatric research. 2002 Jan-Feb; [PubMed PMID: 11755459]
Janowsky DS, Hong E, Morter S, Howe L. Myers Briggs Type indicator personality profiles in unipolar depressed patients. The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry. 2002 Oct:3(4):207-15 [PubMed PMID: 12516312]
Clack GB, Allen J, Cooper D, Head JO. Personality differences between doctors and their patients: implications for the teaching of communication skills. Medical education. 2004 Feb:38(2):177-86 [PubMed PMID: 14871388]
Lifchez SD, Redett RJ 3rd. A standardized patient model to teach and assess professionalism and communication skills: the effect of personality type on performance. Journal of surgical education. 2014 May-Jun:71(3):297-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.09.010. Epub 2014 Jan 1 [PubMed PMID: 24797843]
Iramaneerat C, Instruction and assessment of professionalism for surgery residents. Journal of surgical education. 2009 May-Jun; [PubMed PMID: 19712915]
Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne. 1995 May 1:152(9):1423-33 [PubMed PMID: 7728691]
Huntington B, Kuhn N. Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). 2003 Apr:16(2):157-61; discussion 161 [PubMed PMID: 16278732]