Back To Search Results

Pharmacy Communication Strategies

Editor: Letitia Warunek Updated: 4/15/2024 3:26:27 PM

Introduction

Motivational interviewing is a communication style characterized by its collaborative and goal-oriented approach to delving into underlying issues related to resistance or ambivalence toward behavior change.[1] Motivational interviewing strategies have been incorporated into various realms of healthcare, including medical care, dentistry, physical therapy, and numerous other disciplines.[2][3][4] This activity reveals the positive and beneficial effects of motivational interviewing in enhancing motivation for behavioral changes and improving medication adherence.[5][6]

Function

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Function

Considering the deeply personal nature of behavior change, motivational interviewing emerges as a valuable tool for facilitating positive behavioral shifts. This skill proves particularly beneficial when addressing behaviors that individuals may find challenging to alter, with frequent references to its application in the management of addiction, obesity, and other chronic diseases. However, the utility of motivational interviewing extends beyond these domains, demonstrating relevance across a spectrum of therapeutic and counseling.

Motivational interviewing is often used alongside the transtheoretical model, which provides a systematic framework to comprehend and address the process of behavioral change.[7] This model suggests that individuals progress through a series of stages toward behavior modification (see Table 1. Transtheoretical Model of Change). An accurate assessment and recognition of an individual's stage of change allows clinicians to encourage progression to the next stage or reinforce the maintenance of a changed behavior through motivational interviewing. This patient-centered therapeutic approach to communication involves gauging an individual's internal desire and willingness to make a positive change.[8] Through these reflections, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals can better understand and explore personal motivations and obstacles to change, facilitating targeted counseling, education, and the provision of other resources.[9]

Table 1. Transtheoretical Model of Change

Stages of Change

Definitions

Precontemplation

Lack of awareness and acknowledgment of the problematic behavior (no intention to change)

Contemplation

Awareness and acknowledgment of the problematic behavior (considering change but without commitment to action)
Preparation

Acknowledgment of the problematic behavior with a commitment to correcting it (intending to take action and planning approach)

 Action Modification of behaviors
Maintenance

Efforts to prevent relapse and maintain the taken action

Termination

Eradication of the problematic behavior

Engaging in discussions about personal preferences, values, and belief systems necessitates establishing a trusting patient relationship. Motivational interviewing offers an empathetic framework for fostering trust and addressing ambivalence or resistance in a nonjudgmental manner using effective communication principles. Various techniques, such as reflective listening, open-ended questioning, and affirmation, contribute to creating a supportive environment that encourages understanding and meaningful discussion.

Overall, by establishing collaborative relationships, motivational interviewing allows practitioners to customize interventions according to each individual's distinct characteristics, values, and goals. This skill considers the readiness and willingness to change, providing a personalized approach to care that enhances the relevance and effectiveness of the intervention. 

Issues of Concern

Building Trusting Relationships

Motivational interviewing is commonly acknowledged for fostering comprehension and facilitating behavior change in individuals who may be hesitant, ambivalent, or resistant to change.[5] At its core, the spirit of motivational interviewing is defined by the cultivation of trusting, collaborative patient relationships, which necessitates the practice of accepting and empathizing with patient needs, beliefs, values, goals, readiness, experiences, and perspectives.[10] Motivational interviewing enables practitioners to explore and strengthen an individual's intrinsic motivation to make positive changes in their behavior. Such conversations may reveal discrepancies between an individual's current behavior and their values and goals, which can be crucial points of reflection in considering change.[5] Motivational interviewing provides a structured yet flexible framework that allows practitioners to engage patients in personalized discussions about change while steadfastly honoring the patient's autonomy in the decision-making process.[10]

Specific Techniques

Although motivational interviewing follows general principles, practitioners must adapt their communication strategies to suit each individual's specific needs, motivations, and circumstances. Considering the techniques used in motivational interviewing as a foundational guide rather than a rigid structure enables practitioners to customize their approach to fit the unique characteristics of their patients. 

Motivational interviewing skills are captured in the OARS acronym, which includes open-ended questions, affirmation of strengths, reflective listening, and summarization (see Table 2. Motivational Interviewing Skills). Open-ended questions foster conversations that encourage patients to share and elaborate on their experiences and perspectives, particularly regarding health beliefs and barriers to change. Reflective listening is essential for acknowledging the patient's shared experiences. Repeating or rephrasing information provided by the patient enables them to rectify any misunderstandings on the listener's part.[11]

The practitioner should avoid interrupting or correcting the patient as they share their personal values and beliefs to build a nonjudgmental relationship. While similar to reflective listening, summarization is a skill that involves acknowledging several key concepts throughout the discussion rather than focusing on a single statement. Lastly, affirmation of strengths refers to acknowledging positive patient characteristics or past achievements, potentially boosting confidence or readiness to contemplate behavior change.[12] 

 Table 2. Motivational Interviewing Skills

Skills Explanations

Open-ended questions

Encourage patients to share their experiences and perspectives

Affirmation of strengths

Highlights patient strengths, accomplishments, and efforts made toward change

Reflective listening

  • Communicates respect for patients and encourages nonjudgmental, collaborative relationships
  • Provides support without necessarily agreeing with specific statements
  • Involves repeating or rephrasing the patient's words to demonstrate active listening
Summarization

Similar to reflective listening. The skill captures the key points of several patient statements to demonstrate active listening, foster a shared understanding, convey comprehension, or seek clarification

These skills are often associated with expressing empathy, which constitutes 1 of the 4 core principles of motivational interviewing (see Table 3. Motivational Interviewing Principles).[13] As practitioners delve deeper into understanding the patient, differences between the individual's values and behaviors may become apparent. By acknowledging this discrepancy, practitioners can assist patients in identifying it and determining whether action should be considered. For individuals who exhibit ambivalence or reluctance toward behavior change, using the technique of "rolling with resistance" is essential to honor patient autonomy.[14] Change talk using tools such as 10-point rulers to assess readiness, willingness, or confidence to change may be particularly beneficial in exploring reasons for ambivalence or reluctance. The fourth principle, supporting self-efficacy, incorporates the skill of affirming strengths and focuses on providing positive reinforcement as patients endeavor to change their behavior.

Table 3. Motivational Interviewing Principles

Principles Explanations

Express empathy

  • Establish a meaningful connection and build rapport
  • Reflect on understanding issues from the patient's perspective
Develop discrepancy Explore discrepancies between current behavior and values or goals
Roll with resistance

Accept the patient's fears and concerns regarding change

Support self-efficacy

Boost patient confidence in their ability to change and offer positive reinforcement

 Challenges

Several perceived barriers to motivational interviewing exist, including the time needed to incorporate the skills and principles in practice. However, it is noteworthy that the benefits of motivational interviewing are not contingent on a specific amount of time for effective delivery. Another barrier involves a lack of confidence through inadequate training and comprehension of motivational interviewing concepts, which can be addressed through training and educational programs.[15] In addition to challenges, common pitfalls associated with motivational interviewing exist (see Table 4. Common Pitfalls).[11]

Table 4. Common Pitfalls

Pitfalls Explanations

Expert trap

  • Avoid the "righting reflex" or the directive impulse,  which is the instinct to correct a patient's understanding or behavior immediately
  • Avoid arguing with the patient

Labeling trap

Avoid labeling patients by their medical conditions, such as diabetic

Question-and-answer trap

Avoid having the assessment devolve into an interrogation rather than a conversation

Premature focus trap

Avoid developing plans or actions for change before the patient is ready to commit to change 

Blaming trap

Avoid placing blame or judgment on the patient. Instead, prioritize reassuring patients that you are available to listen and support them

Clinical Significance

As accessible and trusted healthcare professionals, pharmacists are critical in promoting health and wellness. Equipped with training in screening, prevention, and management of chronic conditions, pharmacists utilize motivational interviewing skills to offer comprehensive education and counseling covering both medications and lifestyle behavior modifications.[16] A primary focus lies in enhancing adherence, with challenges often arising in cases of time-consuming or complex regimens or those indicated for asymptomatic conditions.[17] 

Studies examining motivational interviewing as a patient-centered communication approach have suggested improved adherence rates for chronic conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, heart failure, and chronic pain, and improved acceptance rates for immunizations.[18][19][20][21][22] Furthermore, motivational interviewing has also been associated with benefits in encouraging and maintaining lifestyle changes, including physical activity.[23] As a result, motivational interviewing strengthens pharmacists' ability to engage in health promotion efforts. 

Other Issues

Health Literacy

Pharmacists and other healthcare professionals care for people from all different backgrounds, beliefs, and health literacy levels. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) divides health literacy into personal and organizational definitions. Personal health literacy refers to finding, understanding, and using information to make health-related decisions. In contrast, organizational health literacy refers to how organizations enable individuals to find, understand, and use information for health-related decisions (CDC. Health Literacy Basics). These definitions emphasize the use of health information and acknowledge how health literacy impacts others. Health literacy significantly impacts medication understanding, including missed prescription refills and inappropriate dosing or timing of medications.

As a result, individuals with low health literacy are at higher risk of outcomes, including increased rates of hospitalizations and greater use of emergency care. Health literacy disparities are prevalent among vulnerable populations, contributing to the perpetuation of health disparities. Clear communication without medical jargon promotes health equity, and addressing health literacy is fundamental to improving health outcomes within and across communities. Several tools have been developed to examine or assess literacy, health literacy, and numeracy (see Table 5. Health Literacy Screening Tools).[24][25][26][27][28][29][30]

Table 5. Health Literacy Screening Tools 

Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM)

  • Utilizes 66 everyday terms related to anatomy or illnesses to detect inadequate literacy
  • Typically requires 3 to 6 minutes
  • Commonly used in research studies
  • A shortened version, "REALM-SF," is also available
  • Solely evaluates literacy levels
Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA)
  • Comprises 50 reading and 17 numeracy items relating to common medical situations
  • Typically requires up to 22 minutes
  • Commonly used in research studies
  • A shortened version, "sTOFHLA," is also  available
  • Assesses both health literacy and numeracy
Newest Vital Sign (NVS)
  • Consists of 6 questions focusing on interpreting a standard nutrition label
  • Typically takes 3 minutes
  • Has been tested in primary care settings
  • Assesses health literacy and numeracy
Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS)
  • Features a single item prompting patients to rate, on a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), how frequently they require aid with reading health-related materials
  • Brief to administer
  • Assesses literacy and health literacy
Short Assessment of Health Literacy for Spanish Adults (SAHLSA-50)
  • Comprises 50 reading items with reading comprehension elements
  • Assesses health literacy
Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) Offers a systematic method to evaluate and compare the comprehensibility and usability of printed and audiovisual patient education materials

Certain factors such as age, education, and health insurance status may predispose individuals to low health literacy (NCES, National Assessment of Adult Literacy). Indications of low health literacy include frequently missed appointments, medication nonadherence, difficulty identifying medications or recalling their purpose and dosage, asking fewer questions, and failure to follow through on tests or referrals (AHRQ, The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health Literacy: Hidden Barriers and Practical Strategies). However, it is noteworthy that low health literacy cannot be discerned through appearances alone. As a result, universal precautions are recommended wherein care delivery should consider everyone to have limited health literacy. Successful implementation of motivational interviewing and effective communication involves several strategies to address varying levels of health literacy (see Table 6. Strategies for Addressing Health Literacy) (AHRQ. Health Literacy: Hidden Barriers and Practical Strategies).[31][32]

 Table 6. Strategies for Addressing Health Literacy

Using plain, non-medical language

  • Avoiding using medical jargon
  • Providing specific explanations
  • Illustrating with examples

Prioritizing key points

  • Limiting information and reinforcing key points to prevent information overload
  • Writing down complex information or providing patient-friendly handouts

Using visual aids

  • Drawing or showing pictures
  • Using placebo devices
  • Explaining and demonstrating skills

Increasing patient participation

  • Encouraging questions
  • Urging patients to bring family members or friends to appointments

Assessing knowledge and skills

Using the "teach-back" method and correcting any inaccuracies

Chunking and checking
  • Breaking down complex topics into manageable sections
  • Assessing knowledge at the end of each section

Documentation

Documenting patient interactions in the medical record is important for follow-up and communicating changes with the medical team. Documentation should be clear, concise, and comprehensive. To mitigate the risk of misinterpretation, clinicians should adhere to the US Institute of Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) list of error-prone abbreviations, symbols, and dose designations. This list contains symbols and abbreviations commonly associated with errors or mistakes, which can have harmful results.

Medical documentation should include patient concerns and health beliefs. For patients who decline changes due to ambivalence or reluctance, their reasons should be noted in a nonjudgmental manner. Documentation should also be completed in a timely manner, ideally as soon as the encounter has ended. To this end, templates for common encounters could be established in the electronic medical record for efficiency. However, caution should be exercised when cutting and pasting information from previous notes to minimize the risk of perpetuating outdated or inaccurate information. Indeed, some institutions prohibit providers from using cut-and-paste functions within patient encounter notes to mitigate these errors. 

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Motivational interviewing is a communication strategy built upon collaborative relationships between the patient and practitioner. This strategy encourages using open-ended questions and reflective listening to foster a deeper understanding of patient experiences, perspectives, and beliefs. This understanding enables practitioners to tailor interventions to each patient's distinct characteristics, values, and goals.[10] The structured yet flexible framework allows practitioners to engage patients in meaningful conversation while keeping patient autonomy at the forefront of the decision-making process.[10]

All members of the healthcare team can incorporate motivational interviewing into patient interactions. For example, physicians and advanced practitioners can use reflective listening to identify patient perspectives and beliefs when determining disease management strategies. Pharmacists can ask open-ended questions to engage patients in understanding medications and medication adherence. Nurses can demonstrate empathy to build and strengthen patient relationships. In addition, office staff and other healthcare team members can also incorporate aspects of motivational interviewing where appropriate. 

Health systems and medical offices should incorporate training and support documents to educate team members on the successful implementation of motivational interviewing for every aspect of patient care. These training sessions should be conducted collaboratively with all healthcare team members to ensure each discipline comprehends how motivational interviewing can be integrated into their respective roles. Furthermore, motivational interviewing training should be incorporated into standard training programs for remote work and practitioners learning to interact with patients using web-based platforms.

References


[1]

Prescott DS. Motivational Interviewing: as Easy as It Looks? Current psychiatry reports. 2020 May 28:22(7):35. doi: 10.1007/s11920-020-01158-z. Epub 2020 May 28     [PubMed PMID: 32462490]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[2]

Kaltman S, Tankersley A. Teaching Motivational Interviewing to Medical Students: A Systematic Review. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2020 Mar:95(3):458-469. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003011. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31577585]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Kay EJ, Vascott D, Hocking A, Nield H. Motivational interviewing in general dental practice: A review of the evidence. British dental journal. 2016 Dec 16:221(12):785-791. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.952. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27982007]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Jamil A, Javed A, Iqbal MA. Effects of motivational interviewing with conventional physical therapy on rehabilitation of chronic musculoskeletal disorders: A quasi-experimental study. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2021 Apr:71(4):1123-1127. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.873. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 34125755]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Bischof G, Bischof A, Rumpf HJ. Motivational Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Approach for Use in Medical Practice. Deutsches Arzteblatt international. 2021 Feb 19:118(7):109-115. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0014. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 33835006]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Zomahoun HTV, Guénette L, Grégoire JP, Lauzier S, Lawani AM, Ferdynus C, Huiart L, Moisan J. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of epidemiology. 2017 Apr 1:46(2):589-602. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw273. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27864410]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Norcross JC, Krebs PM, Prochaska JO. Stages of change. Journal of clinical psychology. 2011 Feb:67(2):143-54. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20758. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21157930]


[8]

Krebs P, Norcross JC, Nicholson JM, Prochaska JO. Stages of change and psychotherapy outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of clinical psychology. 2018 Nov:74(11):1964-1979. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22683. Epub 2018 Oct 18     [PubMed PMID: 30335193]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[9]

Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. The American psychologist. 1992 Sep:47(9):1102-14     [PubMed PMID: 1329589]


[10]

Arbuckle MR, Foster FP, Talley RM, Covell NH, Essock SM. Applying Motivational Interviewing Strategies to Enhance Organizational Readiness and Facilitate Implementation Efforts. Quality management in health care. 2020 Jan/Mar:29(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000234. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31855929]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[11]

. Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Updated 2019. 2019:():     [PubMed PMID: 34106565]


[12]

Beckwith VZ, Beckwith J. Motivational Interviewing: A Communication Tool to Promote Positive Behavior Change and Optimal Health Outcomes. NASN school nurse (Print). 2020 Nov:35(6):344-351. doi: 10.1177/1942602X20915715. Epub 2020 Apr 26     [PubMed PMID: 32338141]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[13]

Seven M, Reid A, Abban S, Madziar C, Faro JM. Motivational interviewing interventions aiming to improve health behaviors among cancer survivors: a systematic scoping review. Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice. 2023 Jun:17(3):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01253-5. Epub 2022 Sep 14     [PubMed PMID: 36100801]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[14]

Wagner CC, Ingersoll KS. Beyond Cognition: Broadening the Emotional Base of Motivational Interviewing. Journal of psychotherapy integration. 2008 Jun 1:18(2):191-206     [PubMed PMID: 20631922]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[15]

Hatch MR, Carandang K, Moullin JC, Ehrhart MG, Aarons GA. Barriers to Implementing Motivational Interviewing in Addiction Treatment: A Nominal Group Technique Process Evaluation. Implementation research and practice. 2021 Jan-Dec:2():. doi: 10.1177/26334895211018400. Epub 2021 May 31     [PubMed PMID: 35211677]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

White N. Lifestyle Medicine and Health and Wellness Coaching in Pharmacy Practice. American journal of lifestyle medicine. 2018 Nov-Dec:12(6):459-461. doi: 10.1177/1559827618790487. Epub 2018 Jul 30     [PubMed PMID: 30783398]


[17]

Jimmy B, Jose J. Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Oman medical journal. 2011 May:26(3):155-9. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.38. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22043406]


[18]

Abughosh S, Wang X, Serna O, Esse T, Mann A, Masilamani S, Holstad MM, Essien EJ, Fleming M. A Motivational Interviewing Intervention by Pharmacy Students to Improve Medication Adherence. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy. 2017 May:23(5):549-560. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.549. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28448784]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[19]

Aubeeluck E, Al-Arkee S, Finlay K, Jalal Z. The impact of pharmacy care and motivational interviewing on improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. International journal of clinical practice. 2021 Nov:75(11):e14457. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14457. Epub 2021 Jul 1     [PubMed PMID: 34105858]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Cole JW, M H Chen A, McGuire K, Berman S, Gardner J, Teegala Y. Motivational interviewing and vaccine acceptance in children: The MOTIVE study. Vaccine. 2022 Mar 15:40(12):1846-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.058. Epub 2022 Feb 10     [PubMed PMID: 35153096]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[21]

Poudel N, Kavookjian J, Scalese MJ. Motivational Interviewing as a Strategy to Impact Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review. The patient. 2020 Feb:13(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00387-6. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31502239]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[22]

Crawley A, Murphy L, Regier L, McKee N. Tapering opioids using motivational interviewing. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien. 2018 Aug:64(8):584-587     [PubMed PMID: 30108077]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[23]

Suire KB, Peart A, Kavookjian J, Wadsworth DD. Impact of motivational interviewing as a follow-up to an exercise intervention among women with or at risk for metabolic syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. SAGE open medicine. 2022:10():20503121211073434. doi: 10.1177/20503121211073434. Epub 2022 Jan 15     [PubMed PMID: 35070315]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[24]

Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, Crouch MA. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Family medicine. 1993 Jun:25(6):391-5     [PubMed PMID: 8349060]


[25]

Parker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, Nurss JR. The test of functional health literacy in adults: a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. Journal of general internal medicine. 1995 Oct:10(10):537-41     [PubMed PMID: 8576769]


[26]

Baker DW, Williams MV, Parker RM, Gazmararian JA, Nurss J. Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient education and counseling. 1999 Sep:38(1):33-42     [PubMed PMID: 14528569]


[27]

Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockbee J, Hale FA. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Annals of family medicine. 2005 Nov-Dec:3(6):514-22     [PubMed PMID: 16338915]


[28]

Morris NS, MacLean CD, Chew LD, Littenberg B. The Single Item Literacy Screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC family practice. 2006 Mar 24:7():21     [PubMed PMID: 16563164]


[29]

Lee SY, Bender DE, Ruiz RE, Cho YI. Development of an easy-to-use Spanish Health Literacy test. Health services research. 2006 Aug:41(4 Pt 1):1392-412     [PubMed PMID: 16899014]


[30]

Shoemaker SJ, Wolf MS, Brach C. Development of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): a new measure of understandability and actionability for print and audiovisual patient information. Patient education and counseling. 2014 Sep:96(3):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 Jun 12     [PubMed PMID: 24973195]


[31]

Kountz DS. Strategies for improving low health literacy. Postgraduate medicine. 2009 Sep:121(5):171-7. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.09.2065. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19820287]


[32]

Sudore RL, Schillinger D. Interventions to Improve Care for Patients with Limited Health Literacy. Journal of clinical outcomes management : JCOM. 2009 Jan 1:16(1):20-29     [PubMed PMID: 20046798]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence