Mohs Micrographic Surgery Design and Execution of Pedicle Flaps
Introduction
When performing Mohs micrographic facial surgery, many different closure techniques are available to preserve function and cosmesis.[1][2] Island pedicle flaps, a form of advancement flap, are unique as these flaps primarily use the vascular supply from the subcutaneous tissue to prevent flap failure. Island pedicle flaps are used when repairing small- to medium-sized defects where minimal spare tissue is available, as on the face.[3]
The traditional design of the island pedicle flap is a triangle with a short base and 2 long legs of near equal length; variations exist. The base of the triangle is advanced into the position of the primary defect. This flap design allows for convenient closure of the secondary defect because the 2 longer legs of the triangle are already positioned for a linear closure. The original incisions of the flap are V-shaped, with the resulting suture lines in the shape of a Y, which gives the island pedicle flap another name—the V-Y advancement flap.[4][5] This advancement flap severs all dermal attachments around the triangular flap while leaving the subcutaneous vascular attachments on the inferior side of the flap intact.
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
- Search engine and full access to all medical articles
- 10 free questions in your specialty
- Free CME/CE Activities
- Free daily question in your email
- Save favorite articles to your dashboard
- Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Creating an island pedicle flap severs the epidermal and dermal borders to allow all edges of the pedicle to move freely from one position to another, hence the name "island." A thorough knowledge of the underlying anatomy and facial cosmetic units is imperative to complete the flap without complication and optimize the aesthetics of the closure. Due to the preservation of the subcutaneous vessels, the base of the flap has an increased depth compared to other advancement flaps.
To optimize the cosmesis of the resulting scar, island flaps should be used in areas where 1 or 2 margins can be hidden in natural contour lines or rhytids.[6] The triangular shape of the flap makes it impossible to camouflage all suture lines into areas of relaxed skin tension. The underlying stalk of the island pedicle flap can vary in length; this length will dictate the scale of flap advancement. Thinning the subcutaneous stalk may enable further advancement but sacrifices the underlying vasculature. Conversely, maintaining a substantial amount of subcutaneous tissue improves vascular supply but decreases flap mobility and may increase wound tension.[6]
Indications
Experienced Mohs and plastic surgeons commonly use the island pedicle advancement flap to close defects to preserve function and optimize cosmesis. The island pedicle flap is similar to other standard advancement flaps in which the primary tension vector is parallel to the direction of the advancing pedicle. Therefore, an indication for using the island pedicle flap includes closing defects in areas where the surgeon needs to preserve a tension vector that remains parallel with the wound. Additionally, the size and location of the defect dictate the utility of the island flap closure.
The island pedicle technique is particularly suitable for several cosmetic units of the face, including the nose, medial canthus, cheek, junction of the upper lip, and even the ear.[7][8][9] These anatomical regions allow the borders of the flap to be camouflaged within the facial rhytids. Additionally, utilizing the island pedicle flap in the brow area allows for the medial advancement of the remaining brow, ensuring facial symmetry and maintaining brow continuity. This technique provides surgeons a valuable option to achieve optimal cosmetic results in these specific facial areas.
Because the island pedicle advancement flap relies on a subcutaneous vascular stalk to preserve the tissue, the flap remains impervious to ischemia.[10] The island pedicle flap technique is particularly beneficial in areas where skin vascularity may be compromised, such as in patients who have undergone prior radiation therapy or individuals with increased operative risk, such as tobacco users.[11]
Technique or Treatment
The island pedicle flap should be designed before making any incisions. The flap should have a tapered tail to allow closure of the secondary defect after advancing the flap into the primary defect. The flap should also include tissue adequate to fill the primary defect, at least 3 times the diameter of the primary lesion. An inadequately sized flap requires more extensive undermining of tissue or the use of a skin graft for defect closure.
Island pedicle flaps can be modified to promote healing and cosmesis. The long legs of the triangular island pedicle can be modified to match the curvilinear lines of the face instead of keeping the borders of the flap strictly linear.[6] Additionally, rounding off the base of the triangle promotes advancing a semicircular flap edge into a semicircular primary defect.
When incising the island pedicle flap, use strict vertical to outward beveled incisions to free the underlying vascular stalk from adjacent subcutaneous tissue and muscle. To advance the island pedicle, undermine just above the superficial fascia around the peripheral edges of the flap and the primary defect; the inadequate undermining of tissue limits the mobility of the flap.[12] To avoid restriction while advancing the island pedicle, the distal or tapering end of the flap must be free from any deep or lateral restraint. The adequate undermining of tissue allows the island pedicle flap to be freely advanced anywhere from a few millimeters to several centimeters depending on the length of the underlying vascular stalk. Failure to free the flap from tension could result in secondary motion of the tissue around the insertion point of the flap. Depending on the anatomical location, placing undue tension on free margins such as the eyelid or lip is highly likely to result in ectropion or eclabium as post-operative wound contraction ensues.[12]
Once the flap is adequately mobile, the first key suture of the repair may be placed in the central portion of the advancing pedicle and into the corresponding point of the primary defect. Following the key stitch, dermal and epidermal sutures may be placed to close first the primary and then the secondary defects.
Complications
The highly vascular stalk of the island pedicle flap resists ischemia but is also the reason for suboptimal cosmetic outcomes. The resulting scar will likely have a raised kite-shaped appearance from epidermal, dermal, and subcutaneous tissue advancing into a defect. The raised appearance of the scar is known as a “trapdoor” or “pincushion” deformity.[13][14] Creation of an island pedicle slightly smaller, 1 to 2 mm per side, than the closed defect mitigates the risk of creating this deformity. This equitably places tension on all sides of the island pedicle flap, reducing the likelihood of postoperative wound contraction. If the trapdoor effect occurs, massage and intralesional steroid injections have been used successfully to reduce the raised appearance of the tissue.
Additionally, as for all advancement flaps, consideration must be given to the type of tissue at the primary defect and the type of tissue being advanced. For example, advancing a hair-bearing area such as the cheek onto a non–hair-bearing site like the lateral nasal sidewall would be disfiguring for a patient.
Clinical Significance
The island pedicle advancement flap offers the advantage of a mobile, centrally located vascular stalk. This characteristic reduces the requirement for extensive undermining compared to other flaps, making it a prudent choice for individuals with bleeding diatheses or those who are taking anticoagulants.[15] The island pedicle flap is a versatile advancement flap that can be employed in various facial regions. Its applicability extends to areas with diminished or compromised vascularity.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
A successful island pedicle advancement flap can have ideal cosmetic results and low patient morbidity. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team plays a crucial role in attaining these desired results. For example, after creating a primary defect where an island pedicle flap would be indicated for closure, an experienced plastic or Mohs surgeon may feel comfortable closing the defect themselves. However, in large or cosmetically sensitive defects, some surgeons may not feel adequately trained to close a defect in a way that would cause an area to function optimally or be aesthetically pleasing. In such scenarios, a prudent surgeon will seek the expertise of another surgeon to assist in the closure. Each surgeon knowing their limitations is vital to the safety of their patients and the overall outcomes of surgeries performed. For these reasons, access to a network of physicians to rely on for help is invaluable.
Ancillary staff is also essential in helping patients increase their chance of an optimal cosmetic outcome. Patients may be more able to care for their postoperative wounds when nurses and medical assistants are involved.[16] In the immediate postoperative period, the supporting staff has the undivided attention of the patient to explain wound care instructions and possible adverse events such as bleeding, wound infection, and dehiscence. In doing so, patients may feel more equipped to handle postoperative complications such as bleeding.
Although closing a defect with an island pedicle advancement flap depends almost entirely on the skills of an experienced surgeon, the time and effort provided by the physician, supporting staff, and the individualized nature of the patient's condition are all necessary for a successful overall outcome. [Level 5]
References
Cheng F, Li Y, Zhang W, Zhu H, Wu H, Zhang Y, Yin S. [Reconstruction of external nose defect with local flaps]. Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery. 2013 Dec:27(23):1303-6 [PubMed PMID: 24620660]
Wong N, Kossintseva I. Gaining Large Coverage With Small Island Pedicle Flaps in Tight Cosmetic Subunits: Taking Advantage of Rotation and Pincer Principles on the Nasal Ala. Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery. 2020 Mar/Apr:24(2):154-160. doi: 10.1177/1203475420902044. Epub 2020 Feb 27 [PubMed PMID: 32103678]
Howe NM, Chen DL, Holmes TE. Crescentic Modification to Island Pedicle Rotation Flaps for Defects of the Distal Nose. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Sep:45(9):1163-1170. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001855. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30883480]
Allen L, Munroe K, Taylor SM. A novel approach to earlobe reconstruction using the V to Y advancement flap. Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. 2021 May 19:50(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00513-1. Epub 2021 May 19 [PubMed PMID: 34011411]
Hussain W. A Challenging Defect of the Nasal Ala. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Dec:45(12):1689-1692. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001982. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31246866]
Braun M Jr, Cook J. The island pedicle flap. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2005 Aug:31(8 Pt 2):995-1005 [PubMed PMID: 16042923]
Nahai FR, Papadopoulos DJ, Papadopoulos JP, Thatos P, Manalo IF. Nasal Reconstruction Using a Myocutaneous Island Pedicle Flap Based on the Nasalis Muscle With Bilevel Undermining: Review of 57 Cases. Annals of plastic surgery. 2021 Feb 1:86(2):171-174. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002621. Epub [PubMed PMID: 33449464]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSequeira M, Sequeira A. Concurrent Staged Cheek Random Pedicle Flap and Island Pedicle Advancement Flap for Reconstruction of A Full Nasal Alar-Free Margin and Upper Cutaneous Lip Mohs Defect. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Dec:45(12):1681-1684. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001879. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30807386]
Dyson ME, Orangi M, Goldberg LH, Kimyai-Asadi A. Repair of Anterior Ear Defects Using Transcartilage Island Pedicle Flaps. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Oct:45(10):1222-1227. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001799. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30672858]
Ali F, Chiang YZ, Ghura V. Undermining the opposition: Ballistic tips for improving the island pedicle flap. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2016 Jun:74(6):e127-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.031. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27185453]
Nijhawan RI. A Defect Involving the Medial Cheek and Full-Thickness Nose. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Dec:45(12):1685-1688. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001790. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30640774]
Leonhardt JM, Lawrence N. Back to basics: the subcutaneous island pedicle flap. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2004 Dec:30(12 Pt 2):1587-90 [PubMed PMID: 15606848]
Clark ML, Pelster MW, Mattox AR, Maher IA. Repair of a Multisubunit Defect of the Medial Cheek, Nasal Sidewall, Ala, and Apical Triangle. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Dec:45(12):1665-1668. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001694. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31765338]
Trufant JW, Leach BC. Combination Defects of the Nasal Ala and Perialar Cheek. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Dec:45(12):1661-1664. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001698. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30585849]
DeWitt C, Holmes T. Reconstruction of Preauricular Wounds Using a Flipped Island Pedicle Flap. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2019 Jan:45(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001610. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30020100]
Fraher EP, Cummings A, Neutze D. The Evolving Role of Medical Assistants in Primary Care Practice: Divergent and Concordant Perspectives from MAs and Family Physicians. Medical care research and review : MCRR. 2021 Feb:78(1_suppl):7S-17S. doi: 10.1177/1077558720966148. Epub 2020 Oct 19 [PubMed PMID: 33074038]
Level 3 (low-level) evidence